Useful Patterns for BlazeDS
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008While running the Los Angeles Flex Users Group I got a lot of questions from people about how BlazeDS could fit into their existing infrastructure.
Typically, they will have an application container, such as JBoss, or maybe just a servlet container, like Tomcat, and a SQL backend. Usually MySQL or PostgresSQL. JSPs are used for the presentation layer and, sometimes, they may use Struts or SpringMVC as a web application framework. If you’re using ColdFusion this post is likely of little use to you.
Many programmers are understandably weary of introducing yet another component into their system and BlazeDS sounds like such a complex component that it’s often mistaken for a standalone application container that doesn’t readily integrate with standard Java application containers. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Those programmers who follow the bundled BlazeDS examples get stuck trying to figure out how to expand the example to fit their application or how to even start from scratch.
Let’s tackle the first misconception, that is, that BlazeDS doesn’t play well with Java application containers. To put it simply, BlazeDS is configured as a standard servlet. When a Flex client wants to make a request to a BlazeDS server it will issue a POST request to a defined servlet path. That path is whatever you configured the BlazeDS MessageBrokerServlet to. Flex sends the request as an AMF binary payload or an XML version of AMF. I’m glossing over some details but just knowing that you can access BlazeDS as a servlet is a good starting point for figuring out how you can start integrating BlazeDS into your existing application.
What this means to you is that BlazeDS can use container authentication or even work with Spring.
Let me make it even more clear by putting some sample configuration and code.
Here’s the part of the web.xml in which you declare and configure the MessageBrokerServlet:
<servlet> <servlet-name>MessageBrokerServlet</servlet-name> <display-name>MessageBrokerServlet</display-name> <servlet-class>flex.messaging.MessageBrokerServlet</servlet-class> <init-param> <param-name>services.configuration.file</param-name> <param-value>/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.xml</param-value> </init-param> </servlet>
Here’s the part where you map the MessageBrokerServlet to a path:
<servlet-mapping> <servlet-name>MessageBrokerServlet</servlet-name> <url-pattern>/messagebroker/*</url-pattern> </servlet-mapping>
The file “services-config.xml” is the primary configuration file for BlazeDS. Here is where you define a “channel”:
<channel-definition id="amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel"> <endpoint url="http://localhost:8080/sample_bds/messagebroker/amf" .... /> </channel-definition>
This tells the Flex client where to make an HTTP POST request when using the “amf” channel on a RemoteObject, for example.
In fact, try it out on a browser, startup BlazeDS and point to htp://localhost:8080/blazeds/messagebroker/amf/
You’ll get a blank page. That’s a good thing!
The next question I usually get is, “do I have to dump my JSP/WebServices/Struts in order to use BlazeDS?” The answer is definitely no! In fact, if you have a JSP AND a WebServices front end to your application you’re a good bit along the way towards integrating BlazeDS. The reason for this is that if you have two front-ends to your application, and these two front-ends share some functionality, then you have probably structured your application in such a way (using a Service Layer, for example) that makes it easy to add a third front-end.
So what architectural patterns are useful for BlazeDS? To cut to the chase, I use Service Layer, Data Transfer Objects, and Mapper (or Assembler) on the server side. I’ll have a post on what I use on the client side later.
If you have played around with BlazeDS or used it to create a production application you’ve probably followed the examples bundled with the turnkey solution. And you probably have a hunch and instinct about how to create your app. I’m guilty of jumping right in and starting to code from my gut, but after a few days of learning a technology I like to step back and formalize my approach. My first place to consult is Martin Fowler’s Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture (PEAA), and Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (Typically referred to as The Gang of Four Book, or GoF).
Service Layer
A Service Layer can have many methods, each using a variety of domain objects and models. Service Layer have application logic, like telling an emailing component to notify administrators that a payment has been processed, while delegating the business logic to the domain models. It’s pretty easy to figure out what types of methods a Service Layer should support; you can use the user interface as a guide to what sorts of things a client can do or you could base this off your use cases, if you’ve taken the time to do this.
The defining characteristics of Service Layers are the following:
- Defines application boundaries
- Defines available services from the perspective of interfacing clients
- Encapsulates business logics
- Provides convenient place for handling transactions, logging, etc.
- Prepares the response appropriately for the client
That last one brings me to the next pattern I use.
Data Transfer Objects
These are objects that have a bunch of properties, contain no domain logic, and may be structured in a simple hierarchy. When I first started with BlazeDS I was using an Hibernate as my object-relational mapping (ORM) solution and so I was happily transporting the objects I got from a database straight through BlazeDS and over to Flex. Some of my objects had few methods for domain logic, some had more. Few had a complex hierarchies.
Once I started adding parent child relationships and collections then I suddenly encountered a problem where retrieving one of these objects would cause Hibernate to recreate a pretty huge hierarchy. Just as bad was a problem with transactions; when you’re about to send an object down the wire, BlazeDS will call each of its getter methods and each of those Object’s getter methods in turn. This is why it recreates entire hierarchies, but if you close the Hibernate session before BlazeDS has a chance to get to these methods then you’ll get an exception because the Hibernate proxy object can’t get a hold of a session with which to get the rest of the objects out of the database.
There are ways to go around this, such as using the Open Session in View approach, and that works well, though I found it felt awkward because of the name, since the “view” part of this is that hibernate objects are being used by the view and so the session should not be closed, but I also didn’t need to load all the objects that were connected to the one measly object I wanted to read.
I could have used the custom serialization method specified here: Using custom serialization between ActionScript and Java.
So, the simples solution I finally adopted was to use Data Transfer Objects. Characteristics of DTOs are the following:
- May contain aggregated data
- Fields are simple, such as primitives, or other DTOs
The pain of adding DTOs is that you now have to transform some of your domain models, in my case, for example, some of the objects gathered with Hibernate into DTOs. So you have to use the Assembler (or Mapper) pattern. An Assembler can take care of:
- Knowing how to transform an object into a DTO
- How to reconstruct hierarchies for DTOs
- Keeps the domain model independent of external interfaces
- May make use of more than one assembler per dto based on the semantics of the request.
Now I have no problem with building deep hierarchies when I only need one object. If I do need the complete hierarchy I can use a different assembler that knows how to reconstruct that. That’s what the last bullet point on that list is talking about; if it makes sense in one request to bring in all children and grandchildren objects then an assembler can know how to do that, if, instead, all you need, is the one object, then that’s all the other assembler needs to do. In my case, I now had better control over when I could close the session without having to worry about Session closed exceptions.
An additional benefit with respect to BlazeDS and Flex is that the RemoteClass mapping from Flex to Java can always map to DTO and you won’t have to worry about changing your actual Domain Objects and having those changes reflected in the mapped actionscript class; if you remove a property from your domain object then the Java compiler will complain because the assembler will be unable to access that property. You’ve caught the error earlier on.
I didn’t talk about the client side much. I’m working on another post that will address that side.


